You need the LAW OFFICES OF ALAN M. COHEN LLC.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
DOES YOUR ATTORNEY USE ALL MEANS AVAILABLE TO SEARCH OUT YOUR DEBTOR’S ASSETS
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
TESTED INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TURN INTRACTIBLE DISPUTES INTO NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENTS
For more information,
please visit my website at www.collections-law.com,
email me at alanmcohen@collections-law.com
or call me at 508 620 6900.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
DEADBEAT BUSTER NEWSFLASH
WOBURN…. A bank’s debtor had a substantial deficiency
post foreclosure. The bank could have left the file with its foreclosure
counsel but decided to follow its corporate counsel’s recommendation and hired
an aggressive debt collection attorney: Me.
I
immediately conducted asset searches looking for companies in which the debtor
had an interest. I then prepared a
detailed complaint along with motions for bank attachments, real estate
attachments and an expansive reach and apply injunction. I also prepared a full
discovery package - - interrogatories,
document requests and admission requests to be served on the debtor with the complaint and
summons. I sued the bank’s delinquent
customer. Over debtor’s counsel’s vigorous objections, I persuaded the court to
issue far reaching attachments and an injunction. I then withstood the multiple reach and apply defendants’
attempts to dismiss the case. After
brushing off these attempts to sideline my collection tactics, I then
successfully negotiated a high six figure settlement agreement which
incentivized the debtor to pay the debt earlier than later.
Can you say: KA-CHING, KA-CHING,
KA-CHING?!!!
For more information,
please visit my website at www.collections-law.com,
email me at alanmcohen@collections-law.com
or call me at 508 620 6900.
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
DEADBEAT BUSTER NEWS FLASH
FRAMINGHAM…. A plumbing supplier receives a letter from its
customer’s counsel stating that he is going out of business. All creditors will
have to drink from a small pool of money or get nothing at all. If the supplier
agreed on the settlement, they would have received about 25 cents on the
dollar. Instead, the supplier called me.
I
immediately sued seeking ex parte attachments on the debtor’s bank accounts. I not
only convinced the court to allow the bank attachments but also to allow the
sheriff to serve the attachment multiple times on multiple banks of my
choosing. Due to my aggressive actions, the
bank attachment seized the entire amount of money that I sought. Facing threats of potential bankruptcy, I
negotiated a return of 75 cents on the dollar for my client. 25% or 75%:
You decide which settlement you would want. My client chose 75%!! Can you say KA-CHING?!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)